Another manifestation of the matter.

“Insert d”, page 4

d.4 d.1 Open structure molecules- introduction.
d.2 Activation energy.
d.3 Four clues.
d.4 Another manifestation of the matter.

||| contents

Another manifestation of the matter.

.1 After considering all the phenomena illustrated on this site, in order to fit together all the pieces on the board, I am forced to postulate that, what I have so far called activation energy, is another long range modality of action of the matter, beside the force of gravity.

.2 This long range modality of action of the matter would be characterized by a frequency, which would depend on the angular velocity between two masses, in interaction of mouvement.

Its formula.

.3 Its formula would resembles that used for gravitation, with the important difference that the distance is to be raised to the 3rd power (as we see in the case of the tides), and not to the 2nd power.

Range of action.

.4 Thus its range of action is limited, in comparison to that of the gravity.

.5 Indeed, only the movements of the two masses - the Moon, and the Sun - would have enough range of action, to act on the configurations of water molecules, in our planet.

.6 As for those of the EFAs molecules in seeds, may be only the movements of the Moon would have a field strong enough.

“Action d”

.7 Provisionally, I name this long range modality of action of the matter “action d” (letter d stands for dissipative, the main function of this manifestation of the matter).

.8 It would trigger changes in the configurations of the molecules which behave as open structures, such as the EFAs molecules in seeds and the water molecules, provided that all the constraints be satisfied.

Interacting with the other forces.

.9 The gravitation, the other long range force of the matter, has not shown to act in the discrete ways typical of the short range forces; nor to interact with them. At least, so far.

.10 On the contrary, the “action d”, in more than one instance reported in this work, it shows clearly not only to behave in discrete ways, but also to interact with magnetism (insert F, being re-edited for the release 11.2).

.11 These two features of the “action d” are susceptible to provide the ground for more comprehensive theories on the behaviour of the matter, maybe suggesting the missing link between the short range forces and the long range ones.

Commonplace here on Earth.

.12 The dissipative reactions brought about by the “action d” would allow a decrease of entropy in many systems, without an apparent consumption of energy - if you exclude that derived from the movements of the masses. A topic to be studied.

.13 The dissipative reactions are commonplace on our planet, making it possible for our Earth to be a place suitable for life, a fact that, at least as far as we are concerned, is unique, and, in practice, will remain unique.

.14 The dissipative reaction would contribute to maintain it that way, provided the man allows it.

The Earth with no Moon.

.15 It would be otherwise if we had not one Moon, so large, so close.

.16 Once accepted the theory of the “action d”, one can reasonably infer that, in order that a planet is apt to have and maintain living beings, it has to have a satellite, a sort of a co-planet, of adequate mass, whose movements are to keep the entropy of the various systems in check. It would be a conditio sine qua non.

continued (insert F) ||| © copyright notice

	“Insert d”, page 4

d.4	d.1 Open structure molecules- introduction. d.2 Activation energy. d.3 Four clues. d.4 Another manifestation of the matter.
	\|\|\| contents

	Another manifestation of the matter.
.1	After considering all the phenomena illustrated on this site, in order to fit together all the pieces on the board, I am forced to postulate that, what I have so far called activation energy, is another long range modality of action of the matter, beside the force of gravity.
.2	This long range modality of action of the matter would be characterized by a frequency, which would depend on the angular velocity between two masses, in interaction of mouvement.
	Its formula.
.3	Its formula would resembles that used for gravitation, with the important difference that the distance is to be raised to the 3rd power (as we see in the case of the tides), and not to the 2nd power.
	Range of action.
.4	Thus its range of action is limited, in comparison to that of the gravity.
.5	Indeed, only the movements of the two masses - the Moon, and the Sun - would have enough range of action, to act on the configurations of water molecules, in our planet.
.6	As for those of the EFAs molecules in seeds, may be only the movements of the Moon would have a field strong enough.
	“Action d”
.7	Provisionally, I name this long range modality of action of the matter “action d” (letter d stands for dissipative, the main function of this manifestation of the matter).
.8	It would trigger changes in the configurations of the molecules which behave as open structures, such as the EFAs molecules in seeds and the water molecules, provided that all the constraints be satisfied.
	Interacting with the other forces.
.9	The gravitation, the other long range force of the matter, has not shown to act in the discrete ways typical of the short range forces; nor to interact with them. At least, so far.
.10	On the contrary, the “action d”, in more than one instance reported in this work, it shows clearly not only to behave in discrete ways, but also to interact with magnetism (insert F, being re-edited for the release 11.2).
.11	These two features of the “action d” are susceptible to provide the ground for more comprehensive theories on the behaviour of the matter, maybe suggesting the missing link between the short range forces and the long range ones.
	Commonplace here on Earth.

.12	The dissipative reactions brought about by the “action d” would allow a decrease of entropy in many systems, without an apparent consumption of energy - if you exclude that derived from the movements of the masses. A topic to be studied.
.13	The dissipative reactions are commonplace on our planet, making it possible for our Earth to be a place suitable for life, a fact that, at least as far as we are concerned, is unique, and, in practice, will remain unique.
.14	The dissipative reaction would contribute to maintain it that way, provided the man allows it.
	The Earth with no Moon.
.15	It would be otherwise if we had not one Moon, so large, so close.
.16	Once accepted the theory of the “action d”, one can reasonably infer that, in order that a planet is apt to have and maintain living beings, it has to have a satellite, a sort of a co-planet, of adequate mass, whose movements are to keep the entropy of the various systems in check. It would be a conditio sine qua non.

	continued (insert F) \|\|\| © copyright notice