Insert F, page 2.
f.2 f.1 Action d and magnetism: introduction.
f.2 One system at a time.
f.3 Magnetic declination.
f.4 Comparing the farmer's cycle with that of the ocean tides.
f.5 Two time references: normal and magnetic.
f.6 Sun wind and ocean tides.
||| contents
Only one system at a time.
.1 As far as the “action d” is concerned, the EFAs and the water molecules may be part of different systems, though of only one at a time; it would depend on which mass of matter, at a given moment, the strongest “action d” comes, at one of the useful frequencies of movement.
.2 For instance, they may be part of the system Earth-Moon, when the values of the relative movement of the Moon are those required by the molecules under consideration, according to the state of their energy levels.
.3 If at that time, a useful frequency of movement, due to the surrounding matter, comes into play, the molecules in question become part of the system Earth, which then prevails.
Photo

by NASA
Other systems.
.4 They may be part also of the system Earth-Sun.
.5 After considering the masses and the distances of the various planets, on one hand, and, on the other one, the formula of the “action d” (where the distance, on the denominator, is raised to the 3rd power), the possibility that there could be a system Earth-<AnotherPlanet> is ruled out.
One special rule.
.6 The configurational reactions, both in EFAs and in the water, taking place thanks to the “action d”, generated by discrete mouvements of masses external to the Earth, appear to abide by at least one special rule, which does not apply when the movement is in relation to the surrounding matter.
Through the Earth magnetic net.
.7 When the “action d” is triggered, for instance, by the movement of the Moon, it does not produce its effects directly, but as mediated through the magnetic network of the Earth.
.8 In other words, in the system Earth-Moon, it would be the movement of the external mass, with regard to the Earth in its magnetic network, to trigger configurational reactions in the molecules, which behave as dissipative structures, and not the movement of the external mass with regard to the molecules in question directly.
.9 This special rule is inferred from the global cycle of the seeds, as determined by the “moon phase velocity”, reckoned (to build this graph) with regard to the position of the magnetic envelope of the Earth, as if it was stable.
Example of moon phase velocity.
The Earth inside its magnetic envelope.
.10 The position of the magnetic network of the Earth is not always stable. Sometimes, even at mid magnetic latitude, the protection provided by the magnetosphere would become less effective. Then its position may be affected by the the conditions of the solar wind impact; that would contribute to change the normal times of the phenomena here under consideration.
Consequences.
.11 One will see that the phase velocity of the Moon is correlated with a series of phenomena, e.g. with the change in the seed viability (Chapters 2 and 3).
.12 Another example is given by the “water figures” (see chapter one), which are favoured in inverse proportion to the change of that velocity.
.13 Also the formation of hail seems to be favoured by the Moon, ceteris paribus, while its phase velocity is increasing.
Dissipative reactions and inverse ones.
.14 When the “phase velocity of the moon” is increasing, the molecules of essential fatty acids in seeds would be able to assume more ordered configurations, unto the lowest energy levels, while the coherence exchanges are carried out in the dissipative ways.
.15 When the “phase velocity of the moon” is decreasing, the same molecules would be not able to counteract the trend to assume less orderly configurations, on higher energy levels, while the coherence exchanges are carried out in the inverse process, with regard to the dissipative one.
.16 With regard to what I have just said, there would be ephemeral exceptions, in case of momentary reversal of this “phase velocity” - as defined in this study - because of the exceptions considered at the paragraph 10, of this page.
In the water molecules.
.17 As far as the water molecules are concerned, they appear to be able to arrange themselves in an orderly way, anyway, when the “moon phase velocity“ is increasing, and when it is decreasing alike.
.18 One cannot rule out that the water molecules - compared with the others - could show here one of its numerous anomalies, thanks to which they would be able to arrange themselves into orderly ensembles, doesn't matter whether the velocity of movement is increasing, or decreasing.
Possible second special rule: the “time windows”.
.19 I cannot rule out there could be a second special rule, which would manifest itself in space-time ratios, called "time windows", where the configurational reactions in the molecules, here under study, seem to develop in a less chaotic, more orderly fashion.
.20 Also this rule would not apply when the movement is in relation to the surrounding matter.