Insert Q, page 1.
q.1 q.1 How quality in water would be achieved. The transfer of “orderliness”.
q.2 The case of homeopathy. A question of method. A recent experiment. Condition for homeopathy to become science.
On the quality of water.
Foreword.
.1 When at rest with regard to the surrounding matter, water tends to lose many of its useful functions. Eventually, it becomes sort of “dead water”.
.2 To become and stay “alive”, water has to move with respect to the surrounding matter, spinning around itself, in a vortex, possibly at a temperature not too far from the freezing point.
.3 In essence, this is what the followers of the austrian naturalist, Viktor Schauberger, rightly assert.

How quality in water would be achieved.
.4

When at rest with regard to the surrounding matter, water configuration would tend to get to higher energy levels.
.5

When set in motion with respect to the surrounding matter, thanks to the “action d”, water molecules would switch by chance to more orderly configurations, as it would occur to Essential Fatty Acids in seeds in the “experiment A”.
.6 The quality improvement in water would be subject to chances, because the water molecule would assume a more orderly configuration, only when the movement, with respect to the surrounding matter, is at the discrete angular velocity, necessary to give the frequency, corresponding to a transition, possible at a given moment, of energy level.
The release of heat.
.7

The switching to more orderly configurations would require the instant release, outside of the system, of the heat produced at the same time, during the process.
.8 That's the reason why the level of temperature is so important; indeed, a low temperature level eases the transfer of heat.
.9

A system to treat waste water by making it to flow around should then include a way to ease the transfer of heat. That would improve the efficiency of the plant.