Chapter 1, page 2.
1.2 1.1 The water figures - introduction.
1.2 Perception problems with the water figures.
1.3 On the water figures unperceived directly.
1.4 Commonplace water figures.
1.5 Ambient conditions.
1.6 Circumstances affecting the water figures.
1.7 Time relations with the ocean tides.
||| contents
Perception problems with the water figures.
.1 Usually, we do not pay attention to the water figures; we pass by without perceiving them.
If not necessary, it does not catch our attention.
.2 It is possible that the water figures are not perceived when there is no need to see them. I needed to see them, and so I did.
.3 The water figures are objects that may be ignored, most of the times, without loss or damage. On top of that, they found themselves in competition with other objects, more relevant in our daily life, in catching our attention, a limited resource, being limited the time it requires.
The water figures easy to be perceived.
.4 In order to perceive most part of the water figures, one has just to know of their existence, and then to get accustomed to them, until they become commonplace.
.5 A few examples of water figures easy to be perceived are presented on page four of this chapter.
Water figures unperceived directly.
.6 There are also water figures which seem impossible to be perceived directly. They can be perceived only on a photo, or on a film.
.7 It is the case of “spontaneous” waves of protuberances. It is likely that there are other figures of the same category not yet discovered.
On the waves of protuberances.
.8 Often, the water figures take the shapes of protuberances, which can easily be perceived.
.9 Though, sometimes, they get formed starting as “spontaneous waves of protuberances”, unperceived directly.
.10 Spontaneous, because they do not appear to have a cause, such as the wind, a passage of a boat, or anything else.
.11 At present, as they are not perceived directly, one does not know whether they are rare events, or commonplace.
A possible cause.
.12 At the present stage, one cannot rule out that this kind of waves is caused by an abrupt change in the density of water.
.13 A phenomenon just as abrupt can be witnessed in the change of fluidity of EFAs in good quality grains, as a consequence of dissipative configurational reactions.
Peculiarity of the “spontaneous waves”.
.14 The affected area would be reduced to where the water depth is sufficient to cause them.
.15 Between the water depth, and the dimension of a series of “spontaneous waves”, there must be a variable ratio of its own, to be discovered. It must be very different from that valid for the waves caused by the wind, and, still more, from that valid for the waves caused by the passage of a boat.
.16 Because of that, the “spontaneous waves of protuberances” peculiarly affect clearly bounded areas, while the other two types of waves do not.
Lusenzo 070414u0811.
Example 1.
Example 2.
Example 3.
continued ||| © copyright notice